Hiya Mike, I mediate mediate probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be not yet 100% there, however probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be coming shut to the correct rationalization. What I am unable to attain yet is, how the symmetrical lower half of the ‚object‘ is created? Are you able to elaborate on this? Cheers
very melancholy prognosis the scaling is all deplorable to suit that to the posts and mountain. I had a be taught about enhanced pictures and it looks esteem two single hover tri-jets encourage to encourage you would search cockpits.. I knowing it may maybe perchance well of been 2 jets passing banking however lack of motion blur and no excessive bustle digicam however theres lighter then air murky space blimps that will salvage 2 of these jets both aspect as a rapid deployment from 100km fringe of spave being tested.
mike appropriate prognosis however i dont purchase your explanations for the backside fraction of the flying saucers. in the video you said its a 'cloud line' however clouds dont salvage straight strains, and in one more comment you said its a optical illusion however your rationalization explains nothing
Having bump into this video as of late after handiest pleasing hearing of the Calvine UFO, I actually salvage a few questions in regards to the positioning photo probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be evaluating to:1. How will each person is conscious of that the Alejandro Rojas particular person because it will seemingly be identified the positioning?2. Enact you salvage a hyperlink or one thing to demonstrate the positioning of the photo probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be the use of? Something extra explicit that than the “Google Earth” retort you gave one more commenter would be most current.3. At 23.22 what develop to be as soon as the point of evaluating each and every pictures to the artist rendering? You perceived to be suggesting that, since the artist imagined it being over hills and mountains, the other image must salvage hills and mountains hidden on the encourage of the fog/cloud/temperature inversion,and it someway adds weight to the positioning to your photo being correct.I don’t know ample about temperature inversions to claim whether it is miles or isn’t the correct rationalization however, in my scrutinize, the contents of the video don't appear to be the proof that you just construct it out to be. I need to quiet maybe point out I don’t deem it is miles an unidentified flying object or a secret militia project. To me, it may maybe perchance well pleasing be one thing sticking up out of a physique of water, the backside half is a reflection of that object and it’s a foggy day. The Harrier object would pleasing be one thing else floating in the water, or even maybe someone in a tiny boat.
Mike you sound absolutely ridiculous. Take in fishing you don't belong in the UFO community.
Hiya Mike, I mediate mediate probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be not yet 100% there, however probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be coming shut to the correct rationalization. What I am unable to attain yet is, how the symmetrical lower half of the ‚object‘ is created? Are you able to elaborate on this? Cheers
very melancholy prognosis the scaling is all deplorable to suit that to the posts and mountain. I had a be taught about enhanced pictures and it looks esteem two single hover tri-jets encourage to encourage you would search cockpits.. I knowing it may maybe perchance well of been 2 jets passing banking however lack of motion blur and no excessive bustle digicam however theres lighter then air murky space blimps that will salvage 2 of these jets both aspect as a rapid deployment from 100km fringe of spave being tested.
mike appropriate prognosis however i dont purchase your explanations for the backside fraction of the flying saucers. in the video you said its a 'cloud line' however clouds dont salvage straight strains, and in one more comment you said its a optical illusion however your rationalization explains nothing
Having bump into this video as of late after handiest pleasing hearing of the Calvine UFO, I actually salvage a few questions in regards to the positioning photo probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be evaluating to:1. How will each person is conscious of that the Alejandro Rojas particular person because it will seemingly be identified the positioning?2. Enact you salvage a hyperlink or one thing to demonstrate the positioning of the photo probabilities are you’ll perchance well maybe be the use of? Something extra explicit that than the “Google Earth” retort you gave one more commenter would be most current.3. At 23.22 what develop to be as soon as the point of evaluating each and every pictures to the artist rendering? You perceived to be suggesting that, since the artist imagined it being over hills and mountains, the other image must salvage hills and mountains hidden on the encourage of the fog/cloud/temperature inversion,and it someway adds weight to the positioning to your photo being correct.I don’t know ample about temperature inversions to claim whether it is miles or isn’t the correct rationalization however, in my scrutinize, the contents of the video don't appear to be the proof that you just construct it out to be. I need to quiet maybe point out I don’t deem it is miles an unidentified flying object or a secret militia project. To me, it may maybe perchance well pleasing be one thing sticking up out of a physique of water, the backside half is a reflection of that object and it’s a foggy day. The Harrier object would pleasing be one thing else floating in the water, or even maybe someone in a tiny boat.